Key result
The homodyned K distribution model presented better goodness of fit with a maximum relative MLE difference of 6.23% for random or clustered scatterers with a well-organized periodic structure.
Why the study?
Does Homodyned K (HK) distribution modeling improve goodness of fit for characterizing ultrasonic speckles compared to single distribution models?
Does Homodyned K (HK) distribution modeling improve goodness of fit for characterizing ultrasonic speckles compared to single distribution models?
The homodyned K distribution model provides superior goodness of fit for characterizing ultrasonic speckles in tissues with varying spatial organizations, validated in carotid artery imaging.
HK modeling may refine preclinical ultrasonic speckle analysis; leaves open clinical translation without human validation.
Objective: This paper presents an assessment of physical meanings of parameter and goodness of fit for homodyned K (HK) distribution modeling ultrasonic speckles from scatterer distributions with wide-varying spatial organizations. Methods: A set of 3D scatterer phantoms based on gamma distributions is built to be implemented from the clustered to random to uniform scatterer distributions continuously. The model parameters are obtained by maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) from statistical histograms of the ultrasonic envelope data and then compared with those by the optimally fitting models chosen from three single distributions. Results show that the parameters of the HK distribution still present their respective physical meanings of independent contributions in the scatterer distributions. Moreover, the HK distribution presents better goodness of fit with a maximum relative MLE difference of 6.23% for random or clustered scatterers with a well-organized periodic structure. Experiments based on ultrasonic envelope data from common carotid arterial B-mode images of human subjects validate the modeling performance of HK distribution. Conclusion: We conclude that the HK model for ultrasonic speckles is a better choice for characterizing tissue with a wide variety of spatial organizations, especially the emphasis on the goodness of fit for the tissue in practical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2017) studied this question. Homodyned K (HK) distribution modeling vs. Optimally fitting models from three single distributions was evaluated on Goodness of fit and parameter physical meanings. The homodyned K distribution model presented better goodness of fit with a maximum relative MLE difference of 6.23% for random or clustered scatterers with a well-organized periodic structure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: