Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between process performance measures and clinical outcome among patients with hip fracture. DESIGN: Nationwide, population-based follow-up study. SETTING: Public Danish hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 25 354 patients 65 years or older who were admitted with a hip fracture in Denmark between 2010 and 2013. INTERVENTION: The process performance measures, including systematic pain assessment, early mobilization, basic mobility assessment at arrival and at discharge, post-discharge rehabilitation program, anti-osteoporotic medication and prevention of future fall accidents measures, were analysed individually as well as an opportunity-based score defined as the proportion of all relevant performance measures fulfilled for the individual patient (0-50%, 50-75% and 75-100%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day mortality, 30-day readmission after discharge and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Fulfilling 75-100% of the relevant process performance measures was associated with lower 30-day mortality (22.6% vs. 8.5%, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.31 (95% CI: 0.28-0.35)) and lower odds for readmission (21.7% vs. 17.4%, adjusted OR 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.87)). The overall opportunity score for quality of care was not associated with LOS (adjusted OR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.04)). Mobilization within 24 h postoperatively was the process with the strongest association with lower 30-day mortality, readmission risk and shorter LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Higher quality of in-hospital care and in particular early mobilization was associated with a better clinical outcome, including lower 30-day mortality, among patients with hip fracture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kristensen et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: