Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
During CT-guided thermal ablation of lung tumors, guidelines define the intraprocedural endpoint as a circumferential margin of increased attenuation extending 5-10 mm beyond the tumor. This criterion does not require the strict radiologic texture of ground-glass opacity. The timely appearance of this margin is the main real-time marker of an adequate treatment volume, and its absence is conventionally read as underablation, prompting additional energy delivery. We report a metastatic solid nodule in the left lower lobe treated with microwave ablation (45 W, 8 min total) via a single antenna, without repositioning. No such margin formed after three ablation cycles or after needle withdrawal, on a scan obtained 21 min after the first cycle and beyond the recommended 5- to 10-minute window; the only intraprocedural change was slight, non-circumferential enlargement of the solid-attenuation area. A well-defined margin with dense consolidation appeared only at 30.5 h; by 32 days, most consolidation had resorbed, forming a cavity. Despite adequate energy delivery, the guideline-defined margin in this solid nodule remained unconfirmed well beyond the standard observation window, and its absence should not be treated as an automatic indication for further ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: