Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PRÉCIS: The Preserflo MicroShunt effectively lowered intraocular pressure in primary high and normal pressure open angle glaucoma. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Preserflo MicroShunt in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and the 2 variants high (HPG) and normal pressure glaucoma (NPG) after 1 year. METHODS: Single-center prospective interventional case series consecutively including eyes of White/European patients with POAG, who received the Preserflo MicroShunt as a primary and standalone glaucoma intervention. Primary outcome measures: change in mean 24-hour IOP (mdIOP, mean of 6 measurements), peak IOP, IOP fluctuations, antiglaucoma medications, and success rates. Secondary outcome measures include visual acuity, visual fields, complications, surgical interventions, and adverse events. RESULTS: Forty-two eyes of 42 patients with POAG, 29 in the HPG and 13 in the NPG group, were analyzed after 1-year follow-ups. Median [Q25, Q75] medicated mdIOP (mm Hg) dropped by 30% from 16.5 [13.7-27.3] to 12.8 [10.2-14.5] in the HPG and by 40% from 14.3 [13.3-16.0] to 9.5 [8.3-11.1] in the NPG group, with a median postoperative medication use of 0 [0-0] in both groups. At 1 year, 92.5% of eyes were medication-free versus 0% preoperatively. The reduction of mdIOP ( P =1.0), peak IOP ( P =0.932), IOP fluctuations ( P =0.142), and the rate of interventions ( P =0.298) were not statistically significantly different between the HPG and NPG group. None of the patients experienced severe adverse events or loss of vision. CONCLUSIONS: Effective and safe intraocular pressure lowering was observed 1 year following MicroShunt implantation for primary HPG and NPG in White patients of European descent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pillunat et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: