Key result
Cerebral perfusion monitoring shows no cognitive benefit over MAP-guided management in the beach chair position.
Why the study?
Concerns exist regarding neurologic complications related to anesthesia in the beach chair position and whether cerebral perfusion monitoring should be routinely used to minimize these complications.
Does cerebral perfusion monitoring improve cognitive outcomes in patients undergoing anesthesia in the beach chair position?
RCT (n=80)
Single-blind
Randomized
Does cerebral perfusion monitoring improve cognitive outcomes in patients undergoing anesthesia in the beach chair position?
Routine cerebral perfusion monitoring during anesthesia in the beach chair position provides no cognitive advantage over strict maintenance of mean arterial pressure.
No cognitive decline with beach chair position when MAP maintained; leaves open whether routine cerebral monitoring adds benefit.
The beach chair position has been popularized for shoulder surgeries, particularly those involving arthroscopy. Several published case reports and studies have raised concerns for neurologic complications related to anesthesia for surgery performed with patients in the beach chair position. The question has been raised whether cerebral perfusion monitoring should be used routinely to minimize these potential complications. This prospective study evaluated cognitive outcomes in patients who underwent anesthesia in the beach chair position. Patients were randomized to 2 groups. In group 1, the anesthesiologist was blinded to the cerebral monitoring and could treat based only on mean arterial pressure (MAP). In group 2, the anesthesiologist was aware of the results of the cerebral monitoring and could treat any desaturation events. All patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively with a cognitive assessment tool. A total of 80 patients were enrolled in the study, with 40 patients in each group. There were no significant differences regarding age, body mass index, or American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Only 3 desaturation events occurred with no significant change in cognitive function. The findings indicate no advantage to cerebral perfusion monitoring during anesthesia for surgery performed with patients in the beach chair position as long as MAP is maintained within strict limits. Although little is known about the level of cerebral desaturation that will result in cognitive dysfunction, it may likely be related to MAP and cerebral perfusion. The findings of this study reinforce the need for careful monitoring of MAP during surgery and dispute the need for additional expensive monitoring devices. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(1):e27-e30.].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boukhemis et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Patients undergoing surgery in the beach chair position (n=80). Cerebral perfusion monitoring with treatment of desaturation events vs. Blinded cerebral monitoring with treatment based only on mean arterial pressure (MAP) was evaluated on Cognitive outcomes. Cerebral perfusion monitoring during anesthesia in the beach chair position provided no advantage for cognitive outcomes compared to management based solely on mean arterial pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: