dry weight). Shoot concentrations were above the detection limit but close to the quantification threshold. The resulting root-to-shoot translocation factor (TF ≈ 0.26), interpreted as a conservative semi-quantitative estimate because shoot concentrations were below the LOQ, was consistent with limited transfer between plant compartments and a root-dominated distribution pattern under field conditions. This pattern contrasts with studies using pristine monodisperse nanobeads, which reported greater mobility, highlighting the importance of particle realism when assessing NPs behavior in terrestrial environments. Overall, our findings provide field-based evidence for the presence and distribution of environmentally derived eNPs-PS in a soil-plant system under chronic exposure conditions. The qualitative consistency between field observations and previous laboratory studies using environmentally relevant nanoplastics (eNPs) provides a useful link between controlled and field investigations, while emphasizing the importance of environmentally aged and heterogeneous particles when assessing nanoplastic behavior under realistic environmental conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryzhenko et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: