Key result
Danish patients with left-sided colonic cancer were less likely to undergo emergency surgery compared to the Yorkshire population (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.99).
Why the study?
Does a policy of stenting as a bridge to surgery reduce emergency resections and postoperative mortality in patients with colonic cancer compared to standard management?
Cohort (n=41,880)
Yes
Does a policy of stenting as a bridge to surgery reduce emergency resections and postoperative mortality in patients with colonic cancer compared to standard management?
Relative Risk: 0.9 (95% CI 0.82–0.99)
A policy of using stents as a bridge to surgery for colonic cancer obstruction is associated with a reduction in emergency resections and improved 30-day postoperative mortality.
Observational differences support stenting hypothesis for fewer emergency resections; should not change practice without RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Patients with colonic cancer who require emergency colonic cancer surgery often experience poorer outcomes compared with their elective counterparts. In this setting, several treatments approaches are available. In 2009, Danish guidelines recommended treatment with stent for obstruction in left-sided tumours as a bridge to surgery, if expertise is accessible. The aim of this study was to compare the use of elective and emergency resections for colonic cancer and postoperative mortality in two similar demographic populations. METHODS: All patients who underwent a major resection for colonic cancer, between 2005 and 2016 in Denmark and Yorkshire (UK) were identified. The proportion undergoing emergency surgery, the proportion receiving a stent procedure before their resection, and 30-day postoperative mortality were compared between the populations. Logistic regression was used to determine changes in the proportion of those undergoing emergency surgery and 30-day postoperative mortality. RESULTS: Out of 45 397 patients treated during the study interval, 41 880 were selected. Emergency surgery decreased in Denmark from 16.6 per cent in 2005-07 to 12.9 per cent in 2014-16, but increased in Yorkshire (13.5 per cent to 16.8 per cent). Danish patients with left-sided tumours were less likely to undergo emergency surgery (risk ratio 0.90, 95 per cent c.i. 0.82 to 0.99) and an increase in stent use coincided with a statistically significant decrease in emergency surgery in these patients. Thirty-day postoperative mortality in all resections (elective and emergency) decreased in both populations, but a larger decrease was observed in Denmark (7.7 per cent to 3.0 per cent in Denmark and 7.1 per cent to 3.3 per cent in Yorkshire). CONCLUSION: Patients in Denmark experienced a reduction in the use of emergency resection and increase in stenting procedures, following the policy implemented in some departments of converting potential emergency resections into elective resections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in colonic cancer (n=41,880). Danish colonic cancer management (including stenting guidelines) vs. Yorkshire (UK) management was evaluated on Emergency surgery for left-sided tumours (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.99). Danish patients with left-sided colonic cancer were less likely to undergo emergency surgery compared to the Yorkshire population (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: