Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The basic theorems of ‘soft’ game theory are proved. This involves defining six ‘paradoxes’ (or dilemmas) of rationality and proving that if none of them exist, then the players all agree on a solution with strong self-reinforcing properties—a so-called ‘strict, strong equilibrium.’
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nigel Howard (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: