Key result
Sitagliptin shows no cardiovascular benefit over placebo in older patients with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Limited data exist regarding safety and efficacy of antihyperglycemic drugs in older patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Does sitagliptin reduce cardiovascular events in older patients (≥75 years) with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease?
RCT (n=2,004)
double-blind
randomized
Does sitagliptin reduce cardiovascular events in older patients (≥75 years) with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease?
Hazard Ratio: 1.1 (95% CI 0.89–1.36)
Sitagliptin is safe and has a neutral effect on cardiovascular risk in older patients (≥75 years) with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Sitagliptin is safe for glycemic control in older T2D patients with CVD; extends RCT evidence to those ≥75 years without excess risk.
OBJECTIVE Limited data exist regarding safety and efficacy of antihyperglycemic drugs in older patients with type 2 diabetes. The Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessing the impact of sitagliptin on a primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unstable angina hospitalizations in patients with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥6.5% [48 mmol/mol] and ≤8.0% [64 mmol/mol]) and cardiovascular disease. We analyzed baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes for TECOS participants aged ≥75 years. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Clinical and safety event summaries are presented for older versus younger participants and for the treatment groups within the older cohort. RESULTS Of 14,351 participants with age recorded, 2,004 (14%) were ≥75 years old (mean age 78.3 years [SD 3.1]), with 68% men and type 2 diabetes duration median 12.0 years (IQR 7, 21). During 2.9 years median follow-up, older participants had higher rates of the primary outcome (6.46 vs. 3.67 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio 1.72 [95% CI 1.52–1.94]), death (2.52 [2.20–2.89]), severe hypoglycemia (1.53 [1.15–2.03]), and fractures (1.84 [1.44–2.35]). In the older cohort, sitagliptin did not significantly impact the primary composite (1.10 [0.89–1.36]), death (1.05 [0.83–1.32]), heart failure hospitalization (0.99 [0.65–1.49]), severe hypoglycemia (1.03 [0.62–1.71]), rates of acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Among older patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, sitagliptin had neutral effects on cardiovascular risk and raised no significant safety concerns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bethel et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (n=2,004). Sitagliptin vs. Placebo was evaluated on composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unstable angina hospitalizations (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.89-1.36). Among patients aged ≥75 years with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, sitagliptin did not significantly impact the primary composite cardiovascular outcome (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.89-1.36).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: