Key result
System extraction and leadless pacing resolve non-infectious cystic pocket swelling with no 6-month recurrence.
Why the study?
Late-onset non-infective cystic pocket collections after CIED implantation are rare and may mimic infections, creating diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.
Case Report (n=1)
In high-risk patients with late-onset non-infectious pacemaker pocket swelling and diagnostic uncertainty, complete system extraction followed by leadless pacemaker implantation provides an effective strategy for definitive rhythm management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Leadless pacing may avoid recurrent non-infectious pocket complications after extraction; leaves open need for prospective validation before wider use.
Background and Clinical Significance: The widespread use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has led to an increasing number of pocket-related complications. While early hematoma and infection are common, late-onset non-infective cystic pocket collections are rare and may closely mimic infectious processes, creating significant diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. Case summary: We report the case of an 81-year-old woman with a complex medical history (including a previous device-related infection requiring complete pacing system extraction), with a gradually enlarging, painless elastic mass at the secondary pacemaker pocket site, without local inflammatory signs, with normal inflammatory markers, and repeated negative blood cultures. Imaging demonstrated a large cystic collection surrounding the pacemaker. Surgical exploration was performed and a large volume of odourless, thick, yellowish fluid was evacuated from a fibrous capsule. Complete extraction of the pacing system was undertaken. Fluid microbiological cultures were negative and histopathological analysis revealed a chronic, nonspecific fibro-inflammatory granulomatous process. A leadless transcatheter pacemaker was implanted with favourable clinical and procedural outcomes. Conclusions: This case highlights the complexity of decision-making in a late-onset large fluid accumulation within the device pocket when clinical and microbiological evidence of infection is lacking, and the etiology remains uncertain. The local tissue findings, after the pocket has been opened and drained, along with the distinct clinical characteristics of each case, must ultimately define the therapeutic strategy. In high-risk patients with diagnostic uncertainty, leadless pacing systems provide an effective strategy for definitive rhythm management while minimising the risk of future infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roşian et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Non-infectious pacemaker pocket swelling (n=1). Complete pacing system extraction and leadless pacemaker implantation was evaluated on Clinical and procedural outcomes. Complete extraction of the pacing system and leadless pacemaker implantation successfully resolved a late-onset, non-infectious cystic pacemaker pocket swelling with no recurrence at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: