Why the study?
Optimal management strategies for bleeding complications associated with novel oral anticoagulants are currently unestablished.
What are the consensus recommendations for preventing and managing bleeding complications associated with NOACs in Singapore?
What are the consensus recommendations for preventing and managing bleeding complications associated with NOACs in Singapore?
This consensus document provides practical recommendations for the safe prescribing of NOACs and the management of associated bleeding complications in Singapore.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Singapore consensus offers practical guidance for NOAC bleeding where evidence is lacking; leaves open prospective validation across populations.
INTRODUCTION: Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have at least equivalent efficacy compared to standard anticoagulants with similar bleeding risk. Optimal management strategies for bleeding complications associated with NOACs are currently unestablished. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A working group comprising haematologists and vascular medicine specialists representing the major institutions in Singapore was convened to produce this consensus recommendation. A Medline and EMBASE search was conducted for articles related to the 3 available NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban), bleeding and its management. Additional information was obtained from the product monographs and bibliographic search of articles identified. RESULTS: The NOACs still has substantial interactions with a number of drugs for which concomitant administration should best be avoided. As they are renally excreted, albeit to different degrees, NOACs should not be prescribed to patients with creatinine clearance of <30 mLs/min. Meticulous consideration of risk versus benefits should be exercised before starting a patient on a NOAC. In patients presenting with bleeding, risk stratification of the severity of bleeding as well as identification of the source of bleeding should be performed. In life-threatening bleeds, recombinant activated factor VIIa and prothrombin complex may be considered although their effectiveness is currently unsupported by firm clinical evidence. The NOACs have varying effect on the prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time which has to be interpreted with caution. Routine monitoring of drug level is not usually required. CONCLUSION: NOACs are an important advancement in antithrombotic management and careful patient selection and monitoring will permit optimisation of their potential and limit bleeding events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2013) conducted a review in Bleeding complications associated with NOACs. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) was evaluated. Careful patient selection and monitoring when prescribing novel oral anticoagulants will permit optimization of their potential and limit bleeding events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: