Key result
Pecavaptan increases cardiac output by ~25% compared to tolvaptan in experimental heart failure models.
Why the study?
Selective V2 receptor antagonism in heart failure has shown no long-term mortality benefit, potentially due to unopposed V1a receptor activation, motivating comparison of dual V1a/V2 receptor antagonism with selective V2 antagonism.
Does pecavaptan improve haemodynamics compared to tolvaptan in experimental heart failure models?
Does pecavaptan improve haemodynamics compared to tolvaptan in experimental heart failure models?
Simultaneous blockade of vascular V1a and renal V2 receptors with pecavaptan counteracts AVP-mediated haemodynamic aggravation and improves cardiac output in experimental heart failure.
Aims Arginine vasopressin (AVP) mediates deleterious effects via vascular V1a and renal V2 receptors in heart failure (HF). Despite positive short‐term decongestive effects in phase II HF studies, selective V2 receptor antagonism has shown no long‐term mortality benefit, potentially related to unopposed V1a receptor activation. We compared the novel dual V1a/V2 receptor antagonist pecavaptan with the selective V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan in pre‐clinical HF models. Methods and results In vitro IC50 determination in recombinant cell lines revealed similar receptor selectivity profiles (V2:V1a) of tolvaptan and pecavaptan for human and dog AVP receptors, respectively. Two canine models were used to compare haemodynamic and aquaretic effects: (i) anaesthetised dogs with tachypacing‐induced HF, and (ii) conscious telemetric dogs with a non‐invasive cardiac output (CO) monitor. Tolvaptan and pecavaptan exhibited no differences in urinary output. In HF dogs, pecavaptan counteracted the AVP‐induced increase in afterload and decrease in CO (pecavaptan: 1.83 ± 0.31 L/min; vs. tolvaptan: 1.46 ± 0.07 L/min, P < 0.05). In conscious telemetric animals, pecavaptan led to a significant increase in CO (+0.26 ± 0.17 L/min, P = 0.0086 vs. placebo), in cardiac index (+0.58 ± 0.39 L/min/m 2 , P = 0.009 vs. placebo) and a significant decrease in total peripheral resistance (−5348.6 ± 3601.3 dyn × s/cm 5 , P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), whereas tolvaptan was without any significant effect. Conclusions Simultaneous blockade of vascular V1a and renal V2 receptors efficiently induces aquaresis and counteracts AVP‐mediated haemodynamic aggravation in HF models. Dual V1a/V2 antagonism may lead to improved outcomes in HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mondritzki et al. (2020) studied experimental heart failure. Pecavaptan vs. Tolvaptan and placebo was evaluated on Cardiac output (p=<0.05). In experimental heart failure models, pecavaptan counteracted AVP-induced decreases in cardiac output compared to tolvaptan (1.83 vs. 1.46 L/min, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: