Key result
Silver in situ hybridization for MDM2 amplification demonstrated 75% sensitivity, 78.5% specificity, 100% PPV, and 95.8% NPV compared to FISH, but had a 20.8% indeterminate rate.
Why the study?
Does silver in situ hybridization (SISH) provide comparable diagnostic accuracy to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for assessing MDM2 amplification in soft tissue and bone tumors?
Observational (n=192)
Does silver in situ hybridization (SISH) provide comparable diagnostic accuracy to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for assessing MDM2 amplification in soft tissue and bone tumors?
Absolute Event Rate: 17.2% vs 23.6%
SISH is a rapid and cost-effective alternative to FISH for detecting MDM2 amplification in soft tissue and bone tumors, with 100% positive predictive value, though it currently suffers from a high rate of indeterminate results.
The discovery of almost invariable mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) amplification among atypical lipomatous tumors (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma is incorporated into the contemporary diagnostic workup of fatty lesions. MDM2 amplifications are also found frequently in intimal sarcomas and in low-grade osteogenic sarcoma. At present, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the reference test for MDM2 assessment. We are interested in evaluating silver in situ hybridization (SISH) for this purpose. Between October 2016 and May 2020, in 192 consecutive cases requiring MDM2 FISH, SISH was also performed concurrently, including 77 (40.1%) core biopsies and 115 (58.9%) surgical specimens. The mean patient age was 61.0 years. SISH results were available overnight or within 48 hours if repeat testing was required. FISH results were available within 2 to 5 weeks. The cost of SISH was one third of FISH. FISH demonstrated MDM2 amplification in 44 cases (23.6%), was negative in 144 cases (74.4%) and nondiagnostic in 4 decalcified cases (2.0%). SISH showed MDM2 amplification in 33 cases (17.2%), no amplification in 119 cases (62.0%), and indeterminate results because of poor signal in 40 (20.8%) cases. All 33 (100%) SISH-amplified tumors and 113 of 119 (95.0%) nonamplified results were confirmed by FISH. There were no clear differences in the performance of SISH on NCB versus surgical specimens. The overall performance indices of SISH are sensitivity 75%, specificity 78.5%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 95.8%. FISH is not required when SISH is clearly amplified. This is clinically useful and improves efficiency. Nonamplified SISH results provide early indications of the likely FISH findings, but there is a 4.2% chance of FISH being positive. At present, the main drawback of SISH is the high rate of nondiagnostic tests. Optimization of SISH signal detection to reduce the proportion of indeterminate results is our current focus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farshid et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Soft tissue and bone tumors (n=192). Silver in situ hybridization (SISH) vs. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was evaluated on MDM2 amplification detection. Silver in situ hybridization for MDM2 amplification demonstrated 75% sensitivity, 78.5% specificity, 100% PPV, and 95.8% NPV compared to FISH, but had a 20.8% indeterminate rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: