Key result
Prior cardiac surgery is linked to ~25-fold higher odds of choosing TAVI over SAVR.
Why the study?
Patients younger than 80 years undergoing TAVI are less studied and the factors guiding Heart Team decisions between TAVI and SAVR in this population are not well defined.
What factors influence the choice between TAVI and SAVR in patients under 80 years with severe aortic stenosis, and what are their outcomes?
Population
4,801 patients under 80 years with symptomatic severe AS in 93 Italian hospitals
Comparison
Transfemoral TAVI vs surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)
Design
Multicenter observational prospective cohort study
Follow-up
Up to 5 years
Authors
Loading...
Informs TAVI versus SAVR decisions in younger severe AS; observational data leave open whether drivers reflect optimal allocation.
Cohort (n=4,801)
Yes
What factors influence the choice between TAVI and SAVR in patients under 80 years with severe aortic stenosis, and what are their outcomes?
Odds Ratio: 24.73 (95% CI 12.71–48.1)
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients under 80 with severe aortic stenosis, TAVI is selected over SAVR primarily due to high-risk anatomical and clinical factors, resulting in a cohort with higher baseline risk and worse long-term outcomes.
Tarantini et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (n=4,801). TAVI vs. SAVR was evaluated on Decision to perform TAVI over SAVR (predicted by previous cardiac surgery) (OR 24.73, 95% CI 12.71-48.10, p=<0.001). In patients under 80 with severe aortic stenosis, the decision to perform TAVI over SAVR was strongly driven by previous cardiac surgery (OR 24.73; 95% CI 12.71-48.10; P<0.001) and porcelain aorta.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: