Key result
Acute MI decision delay averages ~3.5 hours in Jordanians, predicted by age, anxiety, and symptom waiting.
Why the study?
Decision delay time for seeking health care among Jordanians with acute myocardial infarction was not well characterized and predictors were unclear.
What are the predictors of decision delay to seeking health care among Jordanians with acute myocardial infarction?
Cross-Sectional (n=134)
Yes
What are the predictors of decision delay to seeking health care among Jordanians with acute myocardial infarction?
Decision delay to seeking health care for AMI among Jordanians is alarmingly long, driven by factors like age, anxiety, and waiting for symptoms to resolve.
Prolonged decision delay in Jordanian AMI patients associates with anxiety and symptom waiting; hypothesis-generating for targeted interventions but should not yet change practice.
PURPOSE: To identify predictors of decision delay time for health care seeking among Jordanians with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DESIGN: The study was a cross-sectional descriptive survey. A convenience sample of Jordanians with AMI were interviewed at the coronary care units of two teaching hospitals in Jordan. METHODS: The Arabic version of the modified Response to Symptom Questionnaire was used to assess predictors of decision delay and patterns of health care-seeking behaviors. Decision delay was evaluated by assisting patients to triangulate time of symptom onset and time of decision to seek professional health care by placing both times in context of daily activities that participants could easily remember. Regression analysis was conducted to elicit predictors of decision delay. FINDINGS: Decision delay time among Jordanian men (n=110) and women (n=24) with AMI was alarmingly long (medians 3.5 and 3.6 hours, respectively). Variables that correspondingly predicted decision delay among men and women were age, waiting for symptoms to go away, anxiety due to symptom presentation, and others' responses to patients' symptoms. While 16 other variables (cognitive, emotional, and clinical) independently predicted delay among men, equivalent evidence was not established among women due to the relatively small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Similarities and differences existed between Jordanian men's and women's decision delay to seek health care for AMI. Decision delay time among Jordanians with AMI requires intervention that incorporates awareness of delay predictors. Future research needs to utilize adequate sample sizes of both sexes to obtain a better understanding of sex differences. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To reduce decision delay among Jordanians, health educators should emphasize early symptom recognition and the value of prompt health care-seeking behaviors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khraim et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=134). Various cognitive, emotional, and clinical factors was evaluated on Decision delay time. Among Jordanians with acute myocardial infarction, median decision delay time was 3.5 hours for men and 3.6 hours for women, predicted by age, anxiety, and waiting for symptoms to resolve.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: