Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND The illegal undeclared addition of reconstituted milk powder to ultra‐heat treated (UHT) milk to lower production costs is an example of economically motivated adulteration. This activity not only defrauds consumers but also places honest traders at a disadvantage, which could damage the reputation of milk producers and reduce the integrity of the markets. In this research, a non‐targeted analytical strategy that combines proton (1H) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy with a chemometrics data mining tool was developed for the authentication of bovine UHT milk. RESULTS Unsupervised principal component analysis was used to distinguish UHT and tap‐water‐reconstituted powdered milk. Partial least squares‐discriminant analysis (PLS‐DA) with R2(Y) and Q2 equal to 0.859 and 0.748, respectively, was used to differentiate UHT and reconstituted milk samples. Three compounds were selected as biomarkers to distinguish UHT and reconstituted milk and identified according to the standard NMR‐spectra database. Finally, a PLS‐DA model was established, according to the characteristic spectral bands, to identify UHT milk and reconstituted milk. CONCLUSION This procedure demonstrated the feasibility of using non‐targeted NMR profiling combined with chemometric analysis to combat mislabeling and fraudulent practices in milk production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: