Key result
Lower PON1 concentration is linked to ~80% reduced odds of being CVD-free versus healthy controls.
Why the study?
The relationship between serum paraoxonase 1 concentration, HDL subclasses, and cardiovascular disease status was not fully characterized.
Are PON1 concentration and HDL subclasses associated with the presence of cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors?
Case-Control (n=69)
No
Are PON1 concentration and HDL subclasses associated with the presence of cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors?
Decreased PON1 concentration and altered HDL subclasses are associated with cardiovascular disease, suggesting their potential utility as early predictive biomarkers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice; hypothesis-generating for PON1 as CVD biomarker pending prospective validation.
Introduction Serum paraoxonase 1 (PON1) is now known to be related to cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between PON1 concentration and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subclasses in patients with proven CVD, cardiovascular risk factors but no CVD (CRF), and in healthy controls (control group). Material and methods A case-control study was carried out with 69 volunteers from the Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico. Clinical parameters, lipid profile, PON1 concentration, PON1 activities (AREase and CMPAase), and HDL subclasses were evaluated. Results Patients with CVD had significantly higher glucose and lower total cholesterol than the control group had (p < 0.01). AREase activity was not different between the control (122.57 ±30.72 U/ml), CRF (115.81 ±32.81 U/ml), and CVD (109.34 ±29.60 U/ml) groups. PON1 concentration was significantly lower in CVD patients than in CRF and control patients (p < 0.001); a positive correlation was observed between AREase activity and PON1 concentration in the CVD group (Rho = 0.58; p < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that the decrease in PON1 level was associated with the CVD group (RRR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.09–0.45) but not with the CRF group (RRR = 1.29; 95% CI: 0.89–1.90). Significant differences were observed in HDL 2a and HDL 3a concentrations between the control group and CRF and CVD groups (p < 0.05), but not between the CRF and CVD groups. Conclusions Our data suggest that PON1 status and HDL characteristics could be early biomarkers that predict the potential for developing CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors (n=69). PON1 concentration vs. Healthy controls and patients with cardiovascular risk factors was evaluated on Association of PON1 concentration with cardiovascular disease (RRR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.45, p=<0.001). A decrease in PON1 concentration was significantly associated with the presence of cardiovascular disease (RRR 0.20) compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: