Key result
A structured teaching module with intensive prophylactic measures did not reduce at least grade 2 capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome compared to standard care.
Why the study?
Does a structured teaching module including intensive prophylactic measures reduce the incidence of at least grade 2 hand-foot syndrome in patients receiving capecitabine therapy?
RCT (n=280)
Double-blind
1:1
Does a structured teaching module including intensive prophylactic measures reduce the incidence of at least grade 2 hand-foot syndrome in patients receiving capecitabine therapy?
A structured teaching module with intensive prophylactic measures does not reduce the incidence or severity of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome compared to standard information.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Structured teaching offers no HFS reduction versus standard information; challenges efficacy of intensive prophylaxis and supports current practice.
LESSONS LEARNED: A structured teaching module including intensive prophylactic measures to alleviate hand-foot syndrome (HFS) during capecitabine therapy is feasible but ineffective at protecting patients from HFS. Pharmacologic therapeutic interventions should be investigated for the management of this complication. BACKGROUND: Capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome (HFS) has a detrimental effect on quality of life. The effect of a structured teaching module including intensive prophylactic measures was evaluated. METHODS: This non-crossover phase III double-blinded clinical trial randomized patients in a 1:1 ratio to either a control group or to a group administered a structured teaching model including intensive prophylactic measures on HFS administered by a trained oncology nurse at regular intervals (case) versus standard information on HFS care administered by treating clinician (control). The primary endpoint was comparison of fraction of patients in both arms developing at least grade 2 HFS. RESULTS: Between June 15, 2016, and April 4, 2018, 280 patients (140 to case and 140 to control) were enrolled. The median number of capecitabine chemotherapy cycles was eight; 269 patients (96%) were evaluable for HFS, of whom 89 patients (33.08%) developed at least grade 2 HFS (grade 2 HFS, 73 patients [26.1%]; grade 3 HFS, 16 patients (5.7%}). There was no difference in at least grade 2 HFS between evaluable case and control arms of the study (control group, 45/135 [33.3%]; case, 44/134 [32.8%]; p = .93). CONCLUSION: The use of a structured teaching module including intensive prophylactic measures was feasible, but this did not reduce the incidence and severity of capecitabine-induced HFS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ostwal et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome (n=280). Structured teaching module including intensive prophylactic measures vs. Standard information on HFS care was evaluated on Development of at least grade 2 HFS (p=0.93). A structured teaching module with intensive prophylactic measures did not reduce at least grade 2 capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome compared to standard care.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: