Key result
Indexed LVET detects severe aortic stenosis more accurately than uncorrected LVET with ~0.81 AUC.
Why the study?
Assessment of aortic stenosis severity remains challenging, especially under abnormal hemodynamic conditions, and the value of correcting LV ejection time for its determinants was unclear.
Does left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI) improve the detection of severe aortic stenosis compared to uncorrected LVET?
Observational (n=530)
No
Does left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI) improve the detection of severe aortic stenosis compared to uncorrected LVET?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.812
p-value: p=0.005
Indexing left ventricular ejection time to heart rate and stroke volume index improves the diagnostic accuracy for detecting severe aortic stenosis, irrespective of hemodynamic conditions.
Aims: The assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) severity is still challenging, especially in abnormal hemodynamic conditions. Left ventricular ejection time (LVET) has been historically related to AS severity, but it also depends on heart rate (HR) and systolic function. Our aim was to verify if correcting LVET (LVET index, LVETI) by its determinants is helpful for the assessment of AS severity, irrespective of hemodynamic conditions. Methods and results: We retrospectively studied 152 patients with AS and 378 patients with heart failure and no-AS. At multivariate analysis, LVET (assessed with pulsed-wave Doppler) showed a strong correlation with stroke volume index (SVI) (Beta 0.354; p < 0.001), HR (−0.385; p < 0.001), AS grade (Beta 0.301; p < 0.001) and, less significantly, ejection fraction (LVEF) (Beta 0.108; p = 0.001). AS grade was confirmed to be a major determinant of LVET, irrespective of forward flow (assessed by SVI and transvalvular flow rate) and LVEF (above and below 50%). A regression equation was derived to index LVET (LVETI) to HR and SVI. By using this formula, LVETI detected severe AS more accurately (AUC 0.812, p < 0.001) than LVET alone (AUC 0.755, p for difference = 0.005). Similar results were observed in patients with abnormal flow status. As an exploratory finding, we observed that the highest tertile of LVETI was associated with a higher rate of aortic valve interventions during follow-up. Conclusions: LVETI correlates with AS severity better than uncorrected LVET, independently from hemodynamic conditions, and may help to discriminate severe AS. This finding needs confirmation in larger prospective multicenter studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pestelli et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis (n=530). Left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI) vs. Uncorrected LVET was evaluated on Detection of severe aortic stenosis (AUC 0.812, p=0.005). Left ventricular ejection time indexed to heart rate and stroke volume (LVETI) detected severe aortic stenosis more accurately than uncorrected LVET (AUC 0.812 vs 0.755, p=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: