Key result
LVEF <55% is linked to ~144% higher mortality in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis under conservative management.
Why the study?
No data are available concerning the prognostic value of LVEF in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic severe AS patients with preserved LVEF (≥50%) to identify a threshold associated with increased mortality.
Does an LVEF <55% predict increased mortality compared to LVEF ≥60% in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Population
1,678 patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic severe AS and preserved LVEF (≥50%)
Comparison
LVEF <55% vs LVEF 55-59% vs LVEF ≥60%; initial conservative vs initial surgical management
Design
Cohort study
Authors
Loading...
LVEF <55% flags higher mortality risk under conservative management in asymptomatic severe AS; hypothesis-generating for revised intervention thresholds pending prospective trials.
Cohort (n=1,678)
Does an LVEF <55% predict increased mortality compared to LVEF ≥60% in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Hazard Ratio: 2.44 (95% CI 1.51–3.94)
Absolute Event Rate: 59% vs 72%
p-value: p=<0.001
In asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis, an LVEF <55% is a marker of poor outcome, suggesting these patients should be considered for surgery before reaching the traditional <50% threshold.
Bohbot et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=1,678). LVEF <55% vs. LVEF ≥60% was evaluated on 5-year survival rate (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.51 to 3.94, p=<0.001). In asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis, LVEF <55% was associated with higher mortality compared to LVEF ≥60% under conservative management (HR 2.44; 95% CI 1.51-3.94; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: