Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a previous study, a metal-adsorbing yeast with chemically modified phosphate groups (referred to as P-yeast) was developed. The adsorption performance of P-yeast was evaluated using synthetic seawater and hot spring water for extracting rare earth elements (REEs) from nature. In the case of synthetic seawater containing Dy3+, 90% of the ions were adsorbed while the adsorption of Na+ and Mg2+ present at high concentrations was suppressed. Furthermore, the performance of P-yeast was examined using strongly acidic hot spring water (from Tamagawa hot spring, Japan) containing several tens of ppb of REEs (Ce3+, La3+, Dy3+, and Gd3+). A part of Al3+ and Fe2+ present at high concentrations in hot spring water was removed as a precipitate after pH adjustment while 60%–80% of REEs remained in the solution. Ce3+, the most abundant REE, was contained at 37 ppb. P-yeast could adsorb REEs from the solution after the treatment and, in combination with a desorption phase using acid, these elements could be concentrated 10–19 times with a recovery of 20%–37%. It was strongly suggested that P-yeast is a practical microbial adsorbent, as selective adsorption and concentration were achieved even in environmental water, which has a low concentration of target substances and many contaminants. In the future, P-yeast made from industrial waste such as surplus yeast is expected to be applied to recover rare earth ions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kihara et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: