Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A supervised machine-learning framework was used to relate colocated synchrotron X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray nanodiffraction (XND), thermodynamic descriptors, and nanoindentation measurements to local hardness in an as-cast Cu 15 Ni 35 Ti 25 Hf 12. 5Zr 12.5 high-entropy shape-memory alloy (HESMA). The analysis used 516 measurement points and evaluated multilayer perceptron, k-nearest-neighbor, random-forest, and CatBoost regressors under fold-aware leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). Three feature families were compared: pointwise-normalized local XRF composition values alone, XRF/XND/thermodynamic features without elastic modulus E, and a multimodal family including nanoindentation-derived E and fold-aware interaction terms. For CatBoost, the composition-only, E-free, and multimodal models yielded LOOCV R 2 values of 0.065, 0.214, and 0.342, respectively, with corresponding mean absolute errors of 63.4, 57.5, and 53.8 HV. The out-of-fold maps reproduced broad regional hardness trends but retained substantial pointwise residuals. Leave-one-grain-out validation produced non-positive R 2 values, showing that reliable transfer to an unseen grain was not established. These results define the method as a mapping-domain framework for quantifying local composition–structure–property associations rather than a general predictor across grains, composition ranges, or alloy systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: