Key result
Periprocedural aspirin maintenance linked to ~108% higher post-ESD bleeding risk, concentrated within two weeks.
Why the study?
The bleeding risk associated with periprocedural aspirin maintenance therapy and timing of clopidogrel resumption after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients on antiplatelet therapy was unclear.
Does periprocedural aspirin maintenance increase post-ESD bleeding in patients undergoing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection?
Cohort (n=2,346)
No
Does periprocedural aspirin maintenance increase post-ESD bleeding in patients undergoing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection?
Hazard Ratio: 2.08 (95% CI 1.03–4.21)
Absolute Event Rate: 13% vs 3.4%
p-value: p=0.042
Periprocedural aspirin maintenance increases post-ESD bleeding risk within 2 weeks, but resuming clopidogrel at 2 weeks does not further increase bleeding risk in high thromboembolic risk patients.
Aspirin maintenance during gastric ESD may elevate bleeding risk in low-thromboembolic-risk patients; leaves open optimal clopidogrel resumption timing for prospective validation.
Background/Aims: Aspirin maintenance is recommended during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with antiplatelet therapy (APT) who are at high-thromboembolic risk. We evaluated the post-ESD bleeding risk during aspirin maintenance therapy and the timing of clopidogrel resumption. Methods: Patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer or adenoma between 2011 and 2020 were included. Patients receiving APT who were at low thromboembolic risk stopped APT 7 days before ESD and resumed it 1 month after ESD (interrupted group). Patients receiving APT who were at high thromboembolic risk were maintained on aspirin (maintenance group), and pre-ESD clopidogrel users receiving one or two antiplatelet agents stopped clopidogrel 7 days before ESD and resumed it on day 15 after ESD. The primary outcome was post-ESD bleeding. Results: Of the 2,346 ESD cases, the overall post-ESD bleeding rate was 3.8% (90/2,346). The bleeding incidence was higher in the aspirin maintenance group (13.0%, 16/123) than in the interrupted group (2.9%, 6/209) and nonusers (3.4%, 68/2,014; p<0.001). The increase in bleeding rate was significant within 14 days, whereas it became insignificant ≥15 days after ESD. In the maintenance group, bleeding risk was not significantly increased in pre-ESD single clopidogrel users (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; p=0.582) or dual APT users (HR, 1.18; p=0.797) compared with the single aspirin users. No bleeding events occurred after clopidogrel resumption on post-ESD day 15. Additionally, no thromboembolic events occurred in the maintenance or interrupted therapy groups. Conclusions: Periprocedural aspirin maintenance increased post-ESD bleeding within 2 weeks of gastric ESD. Resuming original clopidogrel therapy 2 weeks after ESD did not increase bleeding risk in patients receiving periprocedural aspirin maintenance therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Early gastric cancer or adenoma (n=2,346). Aspirin maintenance therapy vs. Nonusers of antiplatelet agents was evaluated on Post-ESD bleeding within 4 weeks (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.03-4.21, p=0.042). Periprocedural aspirin maintenance significantly increased the risk of post-ESD bleeding compared to nonusers (HR 2.08), with the increased risk concentrated within the first 2 weeks after the procedure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: