Spatial separation of the target and masker usually improves intelligibility (i.e., spatial unmasking), but this is not well understood in vehicle cabins. This study measured how target-masker separation in a stationary vehicle cabin affects intelligibility and compared spatial release from masking (SRM) across three conditions: a vehicle with the left front window open or closed and a weakly reflective listening room. The listener was always in the driver’s seat; target and masker came from different passenger seats in co-located and separated configurations, yielding 12 target-masker configurations (3 target positions × 4 masker positions) for each acoustic condition. The masker was speech-shaped noise to isolate energetic masking and assess spatial unmasking from acoustic cues alone. Stimuli were created by convolving signals with binaural impulse responses measured at the driver’s position using a dummy head. Mandarin speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured over headphones (N=10), and SRM was derived from these SRTs. A binaural speech intelligibility model was used for further SRM analysis. Results show that for a driver-seat listener, speech from the front-passenger seat is most intelligible and least affected by other-seat maskers, but it is also the most disruptive when it serves as the masker. The back-right seat yields the poorest intelligibility yet causes the least interference with targets at other seats. In the listening room, larger target-masker separation generally increases SRM. In the vehicle cabin, SRM depends on both spatial separation and the non-uniform effects of seat occlusion and boundary reflections. Because the vehicle’s sound field is non-uniform, interaural correlation is reduced and binaural advantage is weakened. SRM in the vehicle is therefore dominated by the better-ear effect, with binaural unmasking contributing less than about 1.5 dB. Opening the left front window has only a small impact on overall intelligibility and SRM but can slightly enhance binaural unmasking by partially restoring binaural advantage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: