Objective To compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and skeletal Class III malocclusion before and 6 months after orthognathic surgery. Study design Longitudinal observational study. Setting Tertiary care. Participants Fifty-two individuals with CLP and skeletal Class III malocclusion. Interventions Orthognathic surgery. Main outcomes Changes in OHIP-14 (oral health impact profile-14) score. Results Among individuals included, 30 (58%) were female, 28 (54%) were ≤ 21 years old, 36 (69%) were “White,” 30 (58%) presented with facial asymmetry, and 38 (73%) had unilateral CLP. Analyses using the Wilcoxon test and the Mann–Whitney U test indicated improvement in OHRQoL. The total OHIP-14 score improved significantly ( p = 0.002), along with the domains of “psychological discomfort” ( p = 0.015), “psychological disability” ( p = 0.002), “social disability” ( p = 0.001), and “participant restriction” ( p < 0.001). The term “participant restriction” has been used to supersede the original domain terminology “handicap”. Exploratory within-subgroup analyses indicated reductions in OHIP-14 scores among females ( p = 0.007), individuals older than 21 years ( p = 0.008), self-reported “White” participants ( p = 0.008), those with facial asymmetry ( p = 0.013), and both unilateral ( p = 0.034) and bilateral CLP ( p = 0.024) phenotypes. However, these within-group changes are exploratory and do not establish significant differences in treatment effect between subgroups. Conclusion Orthognathic surgery improved the OHRQoL in individuals with non-syndromic CLP and skeletal Class III malocclusion. Improvements were observed in the total OHIP-14 score and in psychological, social, and participation restriction domains related to OHRQoL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olsson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: