Objective To evaluate the molecular diagnostic utility of trio-based whole-exome sequencing (trio-WES) in a clinically selected subgroup of children born small for gestational age (SGA) who had failed catch-up growth and/or multisystem anomalies. Methods We retrospectively studied 99 children born small for gestational age (SGA) who had failed catch-up growth and/or multisystem anomalies. Trio-WES included sequence-variant and copy-number variant (CNV) analysis. Sequence variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. CNVs were inferred from trio-WES read-depth data, and parental segregation was assessed from the trio sequencing data. Sequence variants and CNVs were classified using ACMG/AMP and ACMG/ClinGen standards, respectively. Only pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) findings that explained the inheritance model were counted as molecular diagnoses. Results A confirmed molecular diagnosis was established in 59 of 99 children (59.6%).4 variants were categorized as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). These diagnoses comprised monogenic disorders in 44 children (74.6%), CNVs in 13 (22.0%) and dual sequence-variant/CNV diagnoses in two (3.4%). Diagnostic yields were 52.9% (9/17) in children with isolated failed catch-up growth and 61.0% (50/82) in those with multisystem anomalies. Conclusions Trio-WES can provide a molecular diagnosis in a substantial proportion of this selected high-risk SGA subgroup. These findings support the use of trio-WES for molecular diagnosis, individualized management and genetic counselling in high-risk children born SGA.However, the diagnostic yield should not be generalized to the overall SGA population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: