Partial indoor point clouds acquired by light detection and ranging (LiDAR) are frequently affected by occlusion, restricted viewpoints, and non-uniform sampling, making it difficult to recover complete scene geometry while preserving the semantics of architectural structures and interior objects. To address this challenge, we propose the Structure-Aware Dual-Decoder Point Completion Network (SDD-PCN) for joint point-cloud completion and semantic segmentation. SDD-PCN first separates architectural structures from interior objects and applies dedicated multi-resolution encoders to capture their distinct geometric characteristics. The resulting local features are fused with a global scene representation and processed by parallel completion and segmentation streams that exchange information during progressive decoding. We further construct Partial-S3DIS, a partial-scene extension of the Stanford Large-Scale 3D Indoor Spaces (S3DIS) dataset, containing 1632 partial–complete scene pairs generated from 272 annotated rooms through sensor-aware LiDAR simulation. Experiments show that SDD-PCN achieves L1 and squared L2 Chamfer distance (CD-L1 and CD-L2) values of 16.73 and 15.27, respectively, under the ×10−3 reporting convention. Relative to ProtoFormer, the strongest overall baseline, SDD-PCN reduces CD-L1 by 3.96% and CD-L2 by 7.90%, while obtaining the best completion performance in eight of ten scene categories. The model also achieves an overall accuracy (OA) of 87.23%, a mean class accuracy (mAcc) of 74.33%, and a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 63.62%, outperforming both task-matched semantic scene completion baselines across all three semantic metrics. Ablation and robustness analyses confirm that structure-aware encoding and dual-stream feature interaction improve geometric recovery, particularly under moderate and severe missingness. These results demonstrate that explicitly modeling indoor structural heterogeneity provides an effective basis for unified point-based scene completion and semantic understanding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
倪向荣 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: