We consider the scalar heat trace K0(t)=n≥0(n+1)2e−n(n+2)t and the Dirac spinor heat trace K1/2(t)=Tr,e−tD2 on the unit three‑sphere. The spinor trace admits the exact formK1/2(t)=π4t3/2(2‑t),(1+εs(t))with an explicit dual‑lattice bound on εs, whileK0(t)=et⋅π4t3/2(1+ε0(t))concentrates all power corrections in the prefactor et; the mean‑eigenvalue gap of the two spectra then admits the closed formV(t)=3‑t2‑tup to a certified remainder. The ratio R(t)=K1/2(t)/K0(t) is strictly decreasing, and the crossing equation R(t)=1 reduces, with certified dual‑lattice error, to the scalar transcendental equation t+et=2, whose root is expressed in closed form as tc=2‑W(e2) up to a certified 2.7×10−8; crossings against n copies of the spinor trace form the family tc(n)=2‑W(e2/n).On the static cylinder S3×ℝ the two sectors obey distinct thermodynamics: the fermion‑to‑boson entropy ratio tends to 7/4 in the ultraviolet, has no equilibrium point (certified global minimum 1.6547758⋯ at β=1.20204⋯), and diverges in the infrared with determined rate. All numerical values are certified by interval‑enclosed computation. No physical identification of any spectral quantity is claimed or used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian Zhao (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: