Key result
Generic rivaroxaban protocol details a prospective comparison against historical original rivaroxaban for DVT bleeding outcomes.
Why the study?
Widespread use of generic rivaroxaban requires preliminary analysis of its clinical efficacy and safety compared to the reference drug in treating lower extremity DVT.
Does generic rivaroxaban have similar safety and efficacy compared to original rivaroxaban in patients with lower extremity DVT?
Cohort
Does generic rivaroxaban have similar safety and efficacy compared to original rivaroxaban in patients with lower extremity DVT?
This protocol outlines an observational study to evaluate the real-world safety and efficacy of generic rivaroxaban compared to original rivaroxaban for DVT treatment.
Exploratory trial supports generic rivaroxaban in lower-extremity DVT; leaves open need for confirmatory randomized equivalence data.
The advent of generic drugs enhances the availability of antithrombotic therapy. Widespread use of generics requires preliminary analysis of their clinical efficacy and safety compared to the reference drug. Objective. To perform an exploratory evaluation of the therapeutic sufficiency, clinical effectiveness and safety of generic rivaroxaban versus the reference drug in the treatment of patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) during the initial and long-term anticoagulation in a real-world clinical setting. Material and methods. An exploratory observational study with a historical control group is planned, utilizing data from the COBRRA project as the control. The study is designed in accordance with the STROBE standards for observational studies and is registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of the Russian Phlebological Association (ID: VTE.036.07.04022026). The primary outcome is the relative incidence of clinically relevant bleeding, defined as major bleeding (MB) or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Secondary outcomes: relative incidence rates of the composite endpoint (combined progression of thrombosis, MB, and CRNMB); of thrombosis progression; of MB; of CRNMB; absolute rates of VTE-related, bleeding-related and all-cause mortality; patient compliance categories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ilyukhin et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Generic rivaroxaban vs. Original rivaroxaban (historical control) was evaluated on Relative incidence of clinically relevant bleeding, defined as major bleeding (MB) or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). This is a protocol for a prospective cohort study evaluating generic rivaroxaban versus a historical control of original rivaroxaban for deep vein thrombosis; no clinical results are yet available.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: