OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the 15-item and 5-item forms of the Empowerment in Audiology Questionnaire (EmpAQ measures). DESIGN: In Study A, participants completed the EmpAQ-15 and the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory-Screening version (RHHI-S) twice, 3-4 weeks apart. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. In Study B, participants completed the EmpAQ-15 and RHHI-S at baseline (pre-hearing aid fitting) and three and six months post-hearing aid fitting. Responsiveness was assessed using distribution-based, anchor-based, and measurement error-based approaches. We derived EmpAQ-5 from the EmpAQ-15 dataset and analysed it similarly. STUDY SAMPLE: = 51 hearing aid-naïve adults with hearing difficulties. RESULTS: EmpAQ-15 and EmpAQ-5 demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.72 and 0.74 respectively), comparable to the RHHI-S (ICC = 0.77). Following hearing aid fitting, EmpAQ scores increased significantly at 3 months (mean change +9.29 and +10.60; SRM = 0.50 and 0.53). Approximately 21-23% exceeded MDC95 thresholds, indicating individual-level change beyond measurement error. Improvements were maintained at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The EmpAQ-15 and EmpAQ-5 are reliable and responsive measures that capture empowerment changes following hearing aid fitting and complement traditional evaluation tools in contemporary audiological care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bennett et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: