Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Although enteric-coated aspirin is widely used instead of chewable formulations in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD), its effects on cardiovascular and gastrointestinal outcomes remain uncertain. Separately, air pollution is a driver of cardiovascular risk, yet individual-level interventions have not been tested in outcomes trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Coated Or Chewable Aspirin in Patients with Established AThErosclerotic Disease and a Hybrid Strategy to Mitigate the Adverse Effects of AIR Pollution (COATED-AIR) is a randomized trial with a 2x2 factorial design planned to address these knowledge gaps. Patients with ASCVD receiving low-dose aspirin are considered for inclusion. Major exclusion criteria consist of being within 72 hours of acute/unstable ASCVD or revascularization, triple antithrombotic therapy, active/recent bleeding, life expectancy <1 year, or other barriers or unwillingness for enrollment. Eligible consenting patients are randomized, in a double-blind fashion, to enteric coated vs chewable aspirin 81mg daily, and (via factorial randomization) to a hybrid strategy to mitigate the adverse effects of air pollution vs usual care. The hybrid strategy includes 1. an educational flashcard, 2. real-time air quality alerts via cellular text messages, and recommendations to 2a. limit outdoor activity or 2b. to use a KN-95 facemask when outdoors, and 2c. to increase citrus fruit intake on days with elevated pollution levels. The primary efficacy outcome for the aspirin randomization is a composite of fatal/nonfatal ischemic stroke, thrombotic/thromboembolic myocardial infarction, and acute limb ischemia. For the AIR randomization, other forms of cardiovascular death are additionally included in the primary composite outcome. The median planned duration of follow-up is 2 years. Enrollment was completed on 01/28/2026. Clinical follow-up and blinded event adjudications are ongoing. CONCLUSION: COATED-AIR will determine whether aspirin coating affects its safety or effectiveness, and whether individual-level strategies can mitigate cardiovascular risks from air pollution in patients with ASCVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bikdeli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: