When is it proper or acceptable for a speaker to presuppose a proposition in the course of performing a speech act? Taking Stalnaker's common ground model as my background, I argue that this is best framed as a matter of the conversational permissibility of the speaker's presupposition, and that we should not construe this permissibility in terms of the reasonableness of a speaker's presupposition. Instead, I propose that the permissibility of a speaker's presupposition is fixed by what is mutually conversationally salient to all participants, where this can in principle outstrip what any of the participants reasonably regards as mutually salient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanford C. Goldberg (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: