Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: The aim of this article is to examine cosmetic outcomes in facial scar revisions performed against relaxed skin tension lines (RSTL) by adding buried non-absorbable intradermal material (6-0 polyamide black) as the initial closure step of the wound, followed by pertinent cutaneous closure techniques. Material and Methods: We collected data from a total of 53 patients who had undergone surgical scar revisions against RSTL, randomly and retrospectively. We used two different parameters to gauge post-surgical improvement–visual analog scale (VAS) for overall aesthetic outcome as the patient-reported outcome and modified Vancouver scar scale (mVSS) as the physician-reported outcome. The scale of VAS was from 10 to 0 (10 being the worst the scar can look and 0 being the best). VAS and mVSS were compared pre and postoperatively at 6 months. Comparison was done using a paired t -test, and p <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The male-to-female ratio was almost 1:1 (26 males, 27 females), with a mean age of 29.02 ± 10.752 years. The most common site involved was forehead (29.8%), followed by nose and cheeks (22.8% each). The improvements in the mean VAS and mVSS were found to be statistically significant ( p <0.001). Conclusion: We can hereby deduce that robust cosmetic outcomes can be obtained even when performing scar revisions against RSTL, in selected cases, by merely adding strength withan intradermal stitch.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhingradia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: