The inclusion of environmental sustainability in maintenance is becoming increasingly important, and industrial organizations are expected to demonstrate it through corporate reporting and regulatory requirements. Existing eco-maintenance assessment methods, however, rely on sector-specific or expert-weighted criteria and lack an explicit maturity index. This paper proposes the Model for Eco-Maintenance in Organizations (MEMO) and the Eco-Maintenance Maturity Index (EMMI) to assess eco-maintenance maturity across industrial sectors. Methodologically, the model was developed through a systematic literature review conducted according to the PRISMA protocol, binary indicator coding using predefined operational rules, thematic clustering into maturity dimensions, and expert focus-group review. The reproducibility of the finalized binary coding protocol was independently assessed by three coders on a 20.2% subsample of the literature corpus. An exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) was used only to characterize corpus-level indicator co-occurrence and construct an alternative sensitivity scenario, while equal weighting remained the primary EMMI aggregation rule. In the purposively selected 15-organization pilot, EMMI scores ranged from 4.17 to 5.00; ten organizations were classified at Level 5 and five at Level 4. Within this pilot sample, the automotive organizations had the highest mean EMMI score (4.74), while the manufacturing organizations showed the widest within-sample range (4.28–5.00). MEMO and EMMI provide a structured means of benchmarking documented eco-maintenance maturity, identifying improvement areas, and supporting sustainability-oriented maintenance management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nica et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: