Leadership education (LE) can strengthen student success when leaders act early on credible, interpretable signals of academic risk. This paper evaluates a leakage-aware machine learning pipeline for two early-warning tasks: absence-risk classification and performance-risk screening. The pipeline combines categorical encoding, feature scaling, in-fold SMOTE, PCA, stratified cross-validation, and model-specific hyperparameter tuning, and benchmarks five tabular classifiers: K-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB), XGBoost, and LightGBM. Two public educational datasets are used to test the pipeline across a multi-class target and a binary target with different sample sizes and imbalance profiles. Results are reported with accuracy, macro-averaged precision, recall, and F1-score, together with confusion-matrix interpretation. The study contributes a reproducible comparison protocol and a decision-oriented interpretation of model errors; it does not claim that the models are intrinsically fair or that leakage prevention is a mathematical guarantee. The findings show that model performance depends on the risk definition and dataset structure, supporting evidence-based model selection and human-governed intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdullah Ali Salamai (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: