Self-supervised learning provides an effective way to reduce the dependence on manual annotations in remote sensing scene classification. However, existing self-supervised methods often emphasize either global semantic invariance or local structural modeling, while the interaction between global scene context and local patch-level representations remains insufficiently explored. This limitation is important for remote sensing images, whose scene categories are usually determined by both holistic spatial layouts and fine-grained local objects. To address this issue, we propose CoGLoR, a collaborative global–local representation learning framework for self-supervised remote sensing scene classification. The proposed framework jointly integrates global contrastive learning, masked reconstruction, and Contrastive Patch-Level Attention Matching within a unified training pipeline. The contrastive branch learns scene-level semantic consistency across augmented views, while the reconstruction branch encourages the encoder to preserve local structural details by reconstructing masked patches. C-PAM replaces fixed spatial indices with a hard top-K, multi-positive feature neighborhood and contrasts the selected neighbors against batch-level candidates. The selected features are treated as learned neighbors rather than verified semantic correspondences. Experiments on AID, UCMerced Land Use, and NWPU-RESISC45 show that CoGLoR improves over representative contrastive learning, masked modeling, and hybrid self-supervised baselines under linear probing and low-label evaluation protocols. The matched ResNet-50 comparison supports the method-level evaluation; the retrieval figure illustrates cosine-ranking behavior; the ViT-S/16 experiment tests backbone portability; and the resource table quantifies pretraining overhead. Externally pretrained methods are included only as contextual references.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: