Urbanization and population ageing form a compounding risk: the urban heat island effect intensifies thermal and air-pollution stress where the residents least able to thermoregulate are concentrated, with epidemiological evidence confirming disproportionate heat-related morbidity and mortality among adults aged 65 and over. Plant landscapes offer a principal nature-based means of moderating this burden, yet existing reviews address vegetation cooling and the psychological effects of green space separately; few are age-specific, and fewer still translate evidence into design guidance. This review integrates physiological and psychological pathways into a single mechanism chain — “environmental comfort → behavioural participation → psychological restoration” — and translates that chain into hierarchical criteria for age-friendly planting design. Drawing on 221 Chinese-language and 379 English-language articles (2000–2024) from the Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database and the Web of Science Core Collection, we combined CiteSpace bibliometric mapping with structured content analysis. Key findings include: a 10% increase in green space area lowers ambient temperature by 0.2–0.9 °C, trees achieve a mean cooling of 2.8 °C, and tree belts ≥ 40 m wide reduce PM2.5 by up to 67%; psychologically, an interquartile-range increase in residential greenness (NDVI) is associated with approximately 5% lower non-Alzheimer’s dementia risk. Research remains concentrated on parks used by healthy, ambulant older adults, whereas the oldest-old, functionally impaired residents and long-term care settings are markedly under-represented. We argue for a shift from universal to compensatory precision design, repositioning planting from backdrop to active health intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: