Key result
Ticagrelor linked to ~48% fewer ischemic events vs clopidogrel in high-inflammation ACS patients undergoing PCI.
Why the study?
Does ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy reduce ischemic events compared to clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients undergoing PCI when stratified by systemic immune-inflammation index?
Cohort (n=15,123)
Does ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy reduce ischemic events compared to clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients undergoing PCI when stratified by systemic immune-inflammation index?
The systemic immune-inflammation index may help guide P2Y12 inhibitor selection in ACS patients undergoing PCI, with ticagrelor favored in high-SII patients and clopidogrel in low-SII patients.
Ticagrelor was associated with fewer ischemic events than clopidogrel in high-SII ACS-PCI patients; hypothesis-generating for SII-guided P2Y12 selection pending randomized trials.
The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is an established prognostic marker in coronary artery disease. This study investigated the association between SII and 1-year prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and explored its potential utility in informing P2Y12 inhibitor selection. A total of 15,123 consecutive ACS patients undergoing PCI between January 2021 and December 2022 were enrolled. Patients were stratified into high- and low-inflammation groups based on the optimal SII cut-off derived from receiver operating characteristic analysis. The primary endpoint was 12-month ischemic events, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare ticagrelor-based versus clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy within each group. The optimal SII cut-off was 651 × 109/L. Elevated SII was associated with increased ischemic events (HR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.52–2.28; p < 0.0001) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.44; 95% CI: 1.90–3.13; p < 0.0001). In the low-SII group (1,422 matched pairs), ticagrelor was associated with increased bleeding risk (HR 2.15; 95% CI: 1.60–2.88; p < 0.0001) without association with ischemic benefit. In the high-SII group (1,299 matched pairs), ticagrelor was associated with reduced ischemic events (HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.33–0.83; p = 0.006), cardiac death (HR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.23–0.86; p = 0.015), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.23–0.70; p = 0.001) without association with increased major bleeding. The SII is associated with 12-month post-PCI ischemic and mortality risk and demonstrates potential as a candidate biomarker for risk stratification, with exploratory observations of ticagrelor benefit in high-SII and clopidogrel adequacy in low-SII patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhai et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=15,123). Ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy vs. Clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on 12-month ischemic events (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.83, p=0.006). In ACS patients with high systemic immune-inflammation index undergoing PCI, ticagrelor reduced 12-month ischemic events compared to clopidogrel (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.33-0.83; p=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: