Phase-contrast microscopy enhances the visualization of transparent or low-contrast urinary sediment elements but requires specialized optical components. In this study, we develop and evaluate a supervised U-Net-based image-to-image translation model to generate virtual phase-contrast images from brightfield urinary sediment images. A total of 1124 paired brightfield and true phase-contrast images acquired using the UriSed 3 system are classified into 898 training, 113 validation, and 113 test images. The model used a composite loss combining mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and gradient preservation and was compared with a simple convolutional reference model. Performance was evaluated using root mean square error percentage (RMSE%), MAE, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), SSIM, and histogram cosine angle. Blinded expert evaluation included 45 comparison sets across nine urinary sediment categories. The proposed model outperformed the comparator in terms of RMSE% (1.3558 vs. 3.3195), MAE (0.0079 vs. 0.0276), PSNR (38.4257 vs. 29.9917 dB), SSIM (0.9573 vs. 0.9003), and histogram cosine angle (42.3470° vs. 87.0299°). Expert evaluation suggested that the generated virtual phase-contrast images were visually and clinically interpretable. These findings support the use of virtual phase-contrast generation as a supportive visualization tool for urinary sediment analysis, although external validation is required before clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rotbun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: