Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Normalization layers (LayerNorm, BatchNorm, RMSNorm) have long been treated as a training-stability trick, and their mathematical meaning has rarely been examined. Starting from the normalization identity s = h / ||h||, we show that it forces an algebraic split of any hidden state into a hypersphere direction s in S^(D-1) and a magnitude scalar ||h|| --- what we call Normalized State Decomposition (NSD). Substituting into a linear output head yields logit_v = ||h|| * (s^T w_v): direction carries the query, magnitude is only confidence. On this identity we recast inference as deterministic navigation on a fixed hypersphere, treat the LM head as a semantic memory bank, and extract five testable coding laws --- task sparsity, dual voting, structured overlap, weight geometry, and hierarchical differentiation. Without any additional training, the framework unifies three long-standing puzzles --- neuron polysemanticity, superposition, and final-layer linear readout --- explains why NVIDIA's nGPT converges faster as a natural consequence of the spherical constraint, and shows that the sparse autoencoder's "polysemanticity -> superposition -> need a dictionary" chain does not hold geometrically. Experimentally, NSD reconstructs hidden states with zero training and zero error (deep-layer SAE reconstruction error reaches 1.53 on GPT-2); Fisher discriminant ratios locate 254 concept-discriminative dimensions across 20 semantic categories, and editing s along these directions drives 84%--100% of interventions to logit rank 1; adjusting only 20 dimensions redirects "France -> Lyon" from rank 15 to rank 1, with no weight updates. We validate these claims across Transformers, DeltaNet hybrids, MoE, and ViT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang Yingxu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: