This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests telephone-delivered continuing care interventions are effective in reducing rates of substance use. This study assessed the effectiveness of telephone-delivered continuing care for people who had stayed in a residential alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment facility for at least 4-weeks. METHODS: Participants were 277 (20 - 71 years; M = 38 years, SD = 10.4; 58 % male) individuals attending residential AOD treatment. Following discharge participants were randomised to: i) 12 weekly telephone sessions; ii) 4 weekly telephone sessions; or iii) no telephone sessions (control group). A multi-centre prospective, randomised, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE) design compared three study arms with follow up at 3- and 6-months. Primary outcome was the odds of complete abstinence and the days of AOD use for those not completely abstinent at 6-months. RESULTS: At 6-months follow-up, the odds of being completely abstinent in the past month was not significantly different between the three study arms (p > 0.6) and the number of days abstinent was not significantly different (p > 0.4). Participants across all arms were more likely (p < 0.001) to be completely abstinent compared to baseline [12-session OR = 12.86 (5.4, 30.9); 4-session OR = 9.52 (4.0, 22.4); Control OR = 7.02, (3.4, 14.7)]. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the residential programs are associated with positive long-term impacts among participants who complete at least 4 weeks of treatment. Further continuing care research should include those who do not remain in treatment for at least 4 weeks, as they may be likely to benefit the most.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelly et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: