Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effect of the ethylene–methylacrylate copolymer as a chemical compatibilizer in the 50:50 blend of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and polydimethylsiloxane rubber (PDMS) has been studied in detail. Ethylene–methylacrylate (EMA) reacted with PDMS rubber during melt‐mixing at 180°C to form EMA‐grafted PDMS rubber (EMA‐g‐PDMS) in situ, which acted as a compatibilizer in the LDPE–PDMS rubber blend. An optimum proportion of the compatibilizer (EMA) was found to be 6 wt % based on results of dynamic mechanical analysis, adhesion studies, and phase morphology. Lap shear adhesion between the phases increased significantly on incorporation of 6 wt % of EMA. Dynamic mechanical analysis showed a single glass transition (Tg) peak at −119°C. This was further supported by X‐ray diffraction studies, which exhibited a remarkable increase in the degree of crystallinity and phase morphology and showed a drastic reduction in the size of the dispersed phase at the optimum concentration of EMA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santra et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: