Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents the results of a study designed to evaluate the performance of attenuation correction algorithms due to heavy precipitation at operational C-band weather radar frequencies and using differential phase measurements. This paper proposes the extension of two attenuation correction algorithms and shows a methodology to validate attenuation-corrected reflectivity measurements by using a nearby radar as opposed to the traditional use of rain gauge or disdrometer measurements. The results showed that the the adaptive attenuation correction techniques have a higher performance than the nonadaptive ones when comparing the measured and computedΦDPprofiles and also when comparing with reflectivity measurements from a nearby radar. The results also showed that the difference in the performance of the adaptive attenuation correction algorithms is minimal and optimizing a single parameter (e.g.,αin the BRI algorithm) rather than three unknown parameters (e.g.,a,b, andαin the AHB or AFV algorithms) is a more robust procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miguel A. Rico‐Ramirez (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: