This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Hypothesis: The purpose of this retrospective study is to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes associated with the use of a standard metal plate as an endosteal implant in combination with a lateral locking plate to treat 4 patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures. Methods: A retrospective case series study design was utilized, and the medical records of 4 patients with displaced, 3-part proximal humerus fractures treated using this technique between January 2019 and July 2021 were reviewed for this study. The mean age was 52 years (range, 44-57 years). The radiographic outcome of interest was humeral neck-shaft angle preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at the latest follow-up. The average follow-up duration was 62 weeks (range, 12-161 weeks). Results: All fractures healed without loss of reduction or neurovascular deficits. Avascular necrosis was not observed in the 2 patients with sufficient follow-up time to make such an evaluation. The average neck-shaft angles preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at the latest follow-up were 104.8°, 139.8°, and 137°, respectively. Conclusion: Locking plate technology augmented with an endosteal plate provided stable reduction and restoration of physiologic alignment in a small number of patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures. This construct creates a second column of fixation, providing medial column support, and could be removed in the event of a future revision to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braman et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: