Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research Article| November 01 2005 UV and UV/H2O2 treatment of methylisoborneol (MIB) and geosmin in water Erik J. Rosenfeldt; Erik J. Rosenfeldt 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Barbara Melcher; Barbara Melcher 2Camp Dresser & McKee Inc, Chicago, IL 60606, USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Karl G. Linden Karl G. Linden 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA Tel: 919-660-5196 Fax: 919-660-5219; E-mail: kglinden@duke.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua (2005) 54 (7): 423–434. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2005.0040 Article history Received: March 04 2005 Accepted: July 19 2005 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Permissions Search Site Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll JournalsThis Journal Search Advanced Search Citation Erik J. Rosenfeldt, Barbara Melcher, Karl G. Linden; UV and UV/H2O2 treatment of methylisoborneol (MIB) and geosmin in water. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua 1 November 2005; 54 (7): 423–434. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2005.0040 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex The presence of taste and odour-causing compounds in water can lead consumers to perceive the water as unsafe and thus is a great concern for water utilities. This study examined the effectiveness of direct ultraviolet (UV) photolysis and the UV/hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) advanced oxidation process (AOP) for removing methylisoborneol (MIB) and geosmin from raw source water and treated water. Low Pressure (LP) and Medium Pressure (MP) direct UV photolysis removed 10% and 25–50% of the compounds by 1000 mJ cm−2 UV fluence, respectively. The addition of H2O2 created advanced oxidation conditions, and oxidized greater than 70% of these compounds at a UV fluence of 1000 mJ cm−2. MP UV + H2O2 was consistently faster than LP UV + H2O2 for MIB oxidation, but water quality affected both of the UV + H2O2 AOPs. The UV + H2O2 AOP oxidation of these taste and odour contaminants in natural waters was effectively modelled using the steady state OH radical concentration model. Finally, electrical energy per order (EEO) values for oxidation of MIB and geosmin were determined for a model UV reactor, and indicated that the UV + H2O2 AOP requires less than 5 kWh of UV energy to oxidize 90% of MIB or geosmin in 1,000 gallons (3,785 liters) of clearwell or raw blend water, corresponding to a cost of less than US$0.35 per 1000 US gallons (3,785 liters). advanced oxidation, kinetics, photolysis, taste and odour, ultraviolet This content is only available as a PDF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenfeldt et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: