Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Immune system network theory leads to a new symmetry, namely that the antibodies produced in an allogeneic A anti-B immune response (where A and B are, say, two different mouse strains), should have complementary shapes to the antibodies in a B anti-A response. That is, A anti-B is anti-(B anti-A). This symmetry is due to the existence of two readily separable populations of antibodies that are present in alloantisera: anti-foreign and anti-anti-self antibodies. The theoretical basis for the symmetry is described, and results indicating the presence of anti-anti-self antibodies in each of 12 alloantisera (six made in B10-congenic strains, and six made with the unrelated chains CBA, SJL, and C57BL/6) are reported. The finding that hyperimmune alloantisera routinely contain anti-anti-self antibodies suggests that network regulation plays an important role in maintaining self-tolerance during responses to allogeneic cells. We further show that A anti-B serum absorbed against B can specifically prolong the survival of A grafts in a B strain animal. We suggest that this result can be interpreted as being due to A anti-(B anti-A) antibodies preventing B anti-A cells from rejecting the A grafts. We call this phenomenon "reverse enhancement" because it involves the converse antiserum to that used in conventional enhancement of graft survival by specific antibodies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoffmann et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: