Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Healthcare practitioners in Côte d’Ivoire have reported low efficacy rates for the Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL) combination in treating uncomplicated malaria. This study aims to compare the therapeutic responses of two generic formulations of this antimalarial agent, Artéfan® and Coartem®, which have been available in Côte d’Ivoire’s healthcare facilities since 2008. Method: We conducted a comparative analysis of a bi-centric clinical trial in Côte d’Ivoire, evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of Artéfan® in Daloa and Coartem® in Ayamé between 2018 and 2019, following the WHO’s 42-day protocol. The primary evaluation metric was the Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR) at day 42 (D42) post-PCR correction. Results: A total of sixty-two patients were included at each site. The fever clearance time was 24 hours in both Daloa and Ayamé. Parasitic clearance occurred in 48 hours in Daloa and 72 hours in Ayamé. In the per-protocol analysis at D42, the ACPR was 92% in Daloa and 98% in Ayamé, with no significant difference noted (p = 0.1). Conclusion: Artéfan® and Coartem® exhibited statistically equivalent therapeutic efficacy. Nonetheless, the Artemether-Lumefantrine combination warrants further surveillance due to notable re-infestation rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aba et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: