Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The reaction of HC(PPh2)3 with K[AuCl4] in the presence of 2,2′-thiodiethanol in methanol yielded [Au3{HC(PPh2)3}2Cl]2+. The related [Ag3{HC(PPh2)3}2]3+ was prepared by the reaction of HC(PPh2)3 with Ag(CF3SO3) in dichloromethane. Both complex cations were isolated as perchlorate salts. The X-ray structures of [Au3{HC(PPh2)3}2Cl][ClO4]2 and [Ag3{HC(PPh2)3}2][ClO4]3 have been determined: [Au3{HC(PPh2)3}2Cl][ClO4]2·2MeCN, monoclinic, space group C2/c(no. 15), a= 26.466(3), b= 12.741(2), c= 23.012(5)Å, β= 98.89(1)° and Z= 4; [Ag3{HC(PPh2)3}2][ClO4]3·2MeCN, monoclinic, space group, P21/n, a= 14.597(4), b= 23.047(2), c= 22.485(3)Å, β= 91.49(2)° and Z= 4. Both [Au3{HC(PPh2)3}2Cl]2+ and [Ag3{HC(PPh2)3}2]3+ consist of three metal atoms arranged in a nearly equilateral triangle with the M–M–M angles close to 60°. The measured intramolecular Ag–Ag and Au–Au distances of 3.1618(5)–3.2228(9) and 2.9220(8)–3.0889(8)Å respectively, indicate that the Au–Au bonding interaction is much stronger than that for Ag–Ag. The UV/VIS spectrum of an acetonitrile solution of [Au3{HC(PPh2)3}2Cl]2+ exhibits intense absorption bands at 270 and 290 nm, assignable to the dσ·→ pσ transitions. For [Ag3{HC(PPh2)3}2]3+ the UV/VIS spectrum is virtually identical to that of the free HC(PPh2)3. Excitation of a degassed acetonitrile solution of [Au3{HC(PPh2)3}2Cl]2+ at 300–400 nm at room temperature leads to an observed photoluminescence centred at ca. 537 nm with a lifetime of 11 µs [ϕ=(1.0 ± 0.1)× 10–3]. The excited-state redox potential, [Au3{HC(PPh2)3}2Cl]3++ e–→[Au3{HC(PPh2)3}2Cl]2+*, determined by quenching studies with a series of pyridinium acceptors, is –1.6(2) V vs. saturated sodium chloride calomel electrode (SSCE).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Che et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: