Key result
Digital preop tool APAT strongly correlates with clinician ASA grade and accurately predicts risk group.
Why the study?
Triaging patients into and away from preoperative assessment clinics remains a challenge, necessitating evaluation of new tools like APAT.
Does the Anaesthesia Preoperative Assessment Tool (APAT) accurately predict perioperative risk and the need for investigation/intervention compared to conventional clinical assessment in preoperative patients?
Observational (n=22)
Does the Anaesthesia Preoperative Assessment Tool (APAT) accurately predict perioperative risk and the need for investigation/intervention compared to conventional clinical assessment in preoperative patients?
Effect estimate: rτ=0.6075
p-value: p=0.0008
An online preoperative assessment tool accurately predicted perioperative risk and the need for further investigation compared to standard clinician assessment in a small cohort.
APAT may enable home-based risk stratification; leaves open safe clinic bypass for low-risk patients pending larger validation.
Triaging patients into and away from preoperative assessment clinics remains a challenge. Anaesthesia Preoperative Assessment Tool (APAT) is a web application that delivers an online 22 question survey to patients at home, and uses an artificially intelligent algorithm to stratify patient risk and identify the need for non routine preoperative investigation and intervention. We assess APATs accuracy and patient acceptability in this prospective observational study. Patients were recruited at preoperative assessment clinic, where they were assessed by a consultant anaesthetist. Anaesthetist (ASA) grade, need for nonstandard investigation and intervention were recorded (gold standard). Patients were invited to complete an APAT assessment on their PC or smartphone at home, and the results of both assessments compared. 22 patients completed conventional clinical assessment by consultant anaesthetist and online assessment by APAT. APAT score correlates with clinicians ASA grade (rτ=0.6075, p=0.0008). APAT predicts patient risk group (misclassification rate of 0%, Area Under the Curve (AUC)=0.9825). APAT predicts the need for additional investigation (AUC=0.8077) and preoperative intervention (AUC=0.7193). Online assessment was acceptable to 92% of patients. Our findings support the hypothesis that APAT accurately predicts patients perioperative risk and predicts the need for investigation and intervention. Further studies are needed to confirm that APAT may be used to identify ASA 1 and 2 patients who could safely bypass preoperative assessment clinic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O'Shea et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Preoperative assessment (n=22). Anaesthesia Preoperative Assessment Tool (APAT) vs. Conventional clinical assessment by consultant anaesthetist was evaluated on Correlation with clinicians ASA grade (rτ=0.6075, p=0.0008). The Anaesthesia Preoperative Assessment Tool (APAT) score significantly correlated with clinician ASA grade (rτ=0.6075, p=0.0008) and accurately predicted patient risk group (AUC=0.9825).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: