Key result
STIRRED trial tests whether EHR clinical decision support increases steatotic liver disease diagnoses.
Why the study?
Up to a quarter of ED patients have incidental hepatic steatosis noted on imaging, but patients are infrequently notified, potentially delaying MASLD diagnosis and progression.
Does the STIRRED clinical decision support system improve the receipt of a new steatotic liver disease-related diagnosis in ED patients with incidental hepatic steatosis?
RCT (n=4,700)
Stepped Wedge-Cluster
Yes
Does the STIRRED clinical decision support system improve the receipt of a new steatotic liver disease-related diagnosis in ED patients with incidental hepatic steatosis?
This protocol outlines a stepped wedge-cluster randomized trial to evaluate an EHR-based clinical decision support system for improving the diagnosis and referral of patients with incidental hepatic steatosis in the ED.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tests EHR decision support for incidental steatosis diagnosis in ED; RCT protocol will generate needed evidence on implementation.
BACKGROUND: Up to a quarter of emergency department (ED) patients have incidental hepatic steatosis (fatty liver) noted on imaging studies; however, patients are infrequently notified about this new finding. This lack of communication may have consequences including delayed diagnosis of metabolic associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and disease progression. METHODS: This type-2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study uses a Stepped Wedge-Cluster Randomized Trial design across 11 EDs to evaluate an electronic health record (EHR) delivered intervention. The STeatosis Identification, Risk stratification, and Referral pathway in the ED (STIRRED) clinical decision support system leverages the EHR to identify cases of hepatic steatosis and deliver risk-stratified communication to clinicians supporting patient notification about hepatic steatosis in the ED. The primary effectiveness outcome will be receipt of a new steatotic liver disease-related diagnosis among high-risk patients within 120 days post-ED discharge; the primary implementation outcome is fidelity, defined as the degree to which STIRRED was delivered as intended. Over the study period, ∼4700 patients with incidental hepatic steatosis will be analyzed, including 616 high-risk patients, providing 80 % power to detect a risk difference of 5.6 % (odds ratio of 3.5) between STIRRED and usual care in the receipt of a new steatotic liver disease-related diagnosis. DISCUSSION: This trial uses the electronic health record to deliver an evidence-based risk stratification score and referral recommendation to the bedside clinician in patients with incidentally noted hepatic steatosis. Rigorous implementation science methodology used in both the intervention development and assessment will increase the usability of the intervention and future scalability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered on 10/9/2024 with ClinicalTrials.gov (# NCT06944353).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCarthy et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Incidental hepatic steatosis (n=4,700). STIRRED clinical decision support system vs. Usual care was evaluated on Receipt of a new steatotic liver disease-related diagnosis among high-risk patients within 120 days post-ED discharge. The STIRRED trial is a protocol for a stepped wedge-cluster randomized trial to evaluate if an EHR-based clinical decision support system increases new steatotic liver disease diagnoses.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: